Logo
Capital Punishment Clinic

Statutes & Forms | Treatises & Practice Manuals | Forensic Science Resources | Social Science Resources

Sentencing Mitigation | Habeas & Post-conviction | Death Penalty Centers | Stephen Bright Bibliography

KEY RESOURCES

STATUTES & FORMS

Connecticut

Connecticut General Statutes
KFC 3630 1958 .A43 - L3 Reading Room
Westlaw | Lexis | CGS - from the CT General Assembly

Connecticut Practice Book
KFC 3680 .C65 - L3 Reading Room
Connecticut Practice Book
- online from the State of CT Judicial Branch

Capital Punishment in Connecticut
KFC 3680 .C65 - L3 Reading Room
A
page of resources from the Connecticut State Library which contain links to specific statutes, legislative history, and recent case law dealing explicitly with capital punishment in Connecticut. 

Conducting Legislative History in Connecticut
Guide to Connecticut Legislative History - CT State Library
How to Compile a Connecticut Legislative History - online from the CT General Assembly 

Federal

Federal General Statutes
United States Code
GPO Access | KF62 - L3 Reading Room
United States Code Annotated -
Westlaw | KF62.5 .W45 - L3 Reading Room
United States Code Service
Lexis | KF62.5 .L38 - L3 Reading Room

The Federal Judicial Center assist federal judges with case management issues in capital cases.  The site contains numerous sample forms and resources for federal death-penalty prosecutions and capital habeas cases

 

TREATISES & PRACTICE MANUALS

The Law Library has a large collection of Capital Punishment materials available on the 4th floor and with a call number beginning with KF9228.C2.  Of note:

  • Cases and Materials on the Death Penalty KF9227.C2 R58 2005.
  • Capital punishment / edited with an introduction by Margery B. Koosed.   KF9227.C2 C345 1996 (part of a series in Controversies in Constitutional Law).
  • Death penalty USA 2005 - 2006 / Michelangelo Delfino and Mary E. Day.  KF9227.C2 D45X 2008 (contains case histories of yearly executions).

The Law Library also has a large collection of materials related to Criminal Law and Criminal Justice in general.

  • Wharton's Criminal Law. Torcia, Charles E. -   KF9219 .W43
  • Federal Criminal Law and Procedure. Zoline, Elijah N.  - KF9219 .Z8 
  • Criminal Justice 2000. KF9223 .C74 2000
  • Constitutional rights of the accused : post-trial rights / by Joseph G. Cook.  KF9225 .C66 

 

FORENSIC SCIENCE RESOURCES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SOCIAL SCIENCE RESOURCES & GOVERNMENT STATISTICS & DATA

Social Science Databases

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Government Resources

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research Tips for locating Government Reports

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SENTENCING MITIGATION RESOURCES

 

HABEAS AND POST-CONVICTION RELIEF RESOURCES

 

DEATH PENALTY CENTERS AND CLINICS

 

RESPONSIBILITIES OF A CAPITAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY

STEPHEN BRIGHT BIBLIOGRAPHY

Capital Punishment

The failure to achieve fairness: Race and poverty continue to influence who dies.(symposium: Cruel and unusual punishment: Litigating under the eighth amendment). 11 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 23 (2008).

The death penalty and the society we want. 6 Pierce L. Rev. 369 (2008).

Will the death penalty remain alive in the twenty-first century?: International norms, discrimination, arbitrariness, and the risk of executing the innocent. 2001 Wis. L. Rev. 1 (2001).

The death penalty as the answer to crime: Costly, counterproductive and corrupting. 36 Santa Clara L. Rev. 1069 (1996).

Death in Texas - not even the pretense of fairness.  23 Champion 1 (1999).

Developing themes in closing argument and elsewhere: Lessons from capital cases. 27 Litigation 40 (2000).

Jamin B. Raskin, Ira P. Robbins, Stephen B. Bright, Edward Chikofsky, Laurie Ekstrand, Harriet C. Ganson, Paul D. Kamenar, et al, Conference: The death penalty in the twenty-first century. 45 Am. U. L. Rev. 239 (1995).

Henry Schwarzschild, William A. Schabas, David Matas, Diann Yvonne Rust-Tierney, Barbara Frey, Neal Walker, Stephen B. Bright, et al, Commission report: Death penalty on trial, amnesty international USA. 22 Am. J. Crim. L. 272 (1994). 

Death penalty moratorium: Fairness, integrity at stake speaking out in favor of the ABA's position. 13 Crim. Just. 28 (1998).

Counsel - The Right to a Lawyer

Counsel for the poor: The death sentence not for the worst crime but for the worst lawyer. 103 Yale L.J. 1835 (1994).

Neither equal nor just: The rationing and denial of legal services to the poor when life and liberty are at stake. 1997 Ann. Surv. Am. L. 783 (1997).

Turning celebrated principles into reality.  27 Champion 6 (2003).

 

Stephen B. Bright & Andrew A. Mickle, Is the process choking PD system?  Fulton County Daily Report. 2009

Death by lottery--procedural bar of constitutional claims in capital cases due to inadequate representation of indigent defendants. 92 W. Va. L. Rev. 679 (1990).

Trisha Renaud, Agitator of the year: Efforts to create a public defender system in Georgia, Fulton County Daily Report: 4-10.2003

Criminal Justice - Generally

Is fairness irrelevant?: The evisceration of federal habeas corpus review and limits on the ability of state courts to protect fundamental rights. 54 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1 (1997).

The electric chair and the chain gang: Choices and challenges for america's future. 71 Notre Dame L. Rev. 845 (1996).

The politics of crime and the death penalty: Not "soft on crime," but hard on the Bill of Rights. 39 St. Louis U. L.J. 479 (1995).

In defense of life: Enforcing the bill of rights on behalf of poor, minority and disadvantaged persons facing the death penalty. 57 Mo. L. Rev. 849 (1992).

Casualties of the war on crime: Fairness, reliability and the credibility of criminal justice systems. 51 U. Miami L. Rev. 413 (1997).

Judicial Independence

Stephen B. Bright & Patrick J. Keenan, Judges and the politics of death: Deciding between the bill of rights and the next election in capital cases. 75 B.U. L. Rev. 759 (1995).

Political attacks on the judiciary: Can justice be done amid efforts to intimidate and remove judges from office for unpopular decisions? 72 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 308 (1997).

Can judicial independence be attained in the south? overcoming history, elections, and misperceptions about the role of the judiciary. 14 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 817 (1998).

Elected judges and the death penalty in texas: Why full habeas corpus review by independent federal judges is indispensable to protecting constitutional rights. 78 Tex. L. Rev. 1805 (2000).

Stephen B. Bright, Charles F. Baird, George H. Kendall, Stephen F. Hanlon, Charles J. Ogletree Jr., & Penny J. White, Breaking the most vulnerable branch: Do rising threats to judicial independence preclude due process in capital cases. (panel discussion). 31 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 123 (1999).

Stephen B. Bright, Rene Guerra, Mike Heiskell, & Rodney Ellis, Panel 2: The need for timeliness and independence to ensure fairness and the appearance of justice. 42 S. Tex. L. Rev. 1015 (2001).

Racial Discrimination

Discrimination, death and denial: The tolerance of racial discrimination in infliction of the death penalty. 35 Santa Clara L. Rev. 433 (1995).

Bright, Stephen B. 1994. Challenging racism in the infliction of the death penalty. (special issue: Justice in the age of O.J., part 1). Guild Practitioner. 09/22. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
127 Wall Street, New Haven, CT 06511. 203-432-1608
This website is supported by the Oscar M. Ruebhausen Fund at Yale Law School.