April 30, 2004
YLS Student Wins Legal Affairs Writing Contest
Kate Andrias '04 was selected as the first-place winner of the First Annual Legal Affairs Writing Contest for Law Students.
The annual writing competition, sponsored by The Marbury Institute of Piper Rudnick LLP, provides a unique opportunity for law students to be published in a highly regarded general-interest magazine. Legal Affairs launched the contest to help engage students in writing for a general readership and to raise awareness of the links that clear, intelligent writing about the law can forge between the legal world and the broader society.
In her entry, "Locked Out," Andrias argues that employers are curtailing workers' rights by requiring them to sign arbitration agreements that bar pursuit of their interests in court. Andrias will receive a prize of $2,000 and her entry will be published in the "Argument" section of the May/June 2004 issue of Legal Affairs. She is a third-year student at Yale Law School who will clerk for a federal appeals court judge when she graduates.
Students from all accredited law schools in the U.S. were invited to submit an argument about a pertinent topic in the law. The contest attracted 126 entries from 63 law schools. The essays covered a wide range of topics, including what's wrong with law school and why polygamy should be legal. Three of the most popular subjects were religion and the Constitution, international human rights, and same-sex marriage.
In a blind judging process overseen by the law firm of Tyler Cooper & Alcorn, the editors of Legal Affairs evaluated the entries without knowing the names or law schools of contestants until the judging was completed. The entries were evaluated on their accessibility for general readers, ingenuity of reasoning, style and clarity of writing, and strength of support for the argument.
Another Yale Law School student, Tom Saunders '04, took second place ($1,000 prize), for "Ballot Box Budgeting: Why Voters Should Tie Their Own Hands to Keep Their States Out of Court"; University of Pennsylvania Law School student Vicky Ko won third place ($500 prize), for "A Stately Affair: Why American States Should Be Allowed to Have a Say About the Kyoto Protocol."
"The judges were impressed with the quality of the submissions, the time and thought that went into them, and the broad range of topics chosen by the students," said Lincoln Caplan, the editor and president of Legal Affairs. "We believe the contest will reinforce the idea that it's possible to write about legal issues in a manner that's sophisticated and well-informed, as well as engaging and appealing to the general public. The magazine looks forward to the Second Annual Legal Affairs Writing Contest, which will be announced in the fall."
Legal Affairs, which is celebrating its second anniversary this month, is the first general-interest magazine about the law for non-lawyers as well as lawyers. It is an independent non-profit publication with an educational mission. The contest's sponsor, The Marbury Institute, was founded by Piper Rudnick to enhance the firm's commitment to professionalism. The Marbury Institute's components include formal and informal litigation and corporate skills training, a Wise Men and Wise Women's speaker series, ethical roundtables, lectures by scholars, and a variety of other programs focused on professionalism in the law. Piper Rudnick's Chief Operating Officer Jeffrey F. Liss said, "We're truly delighted that the contest generated so much interest and produced so many quality essays, including the prize winners. It is a source of great pride for our firm that we are doing our part, through our sponsorship of the Legal Affairs contest, to encourage clear, persuasive writing about the law."